Abstract
Currently, few studies have examined mediation programmes within independent police oversight agencies. Moreover, analyses of these programmes primarily focus on the degree of citizen satisfaction. This study adds to the existing research by examining possible characteristics linked to mediation selection within independent police oversight agencies. Specifically, this study considers the long-standing tension experienced between the police and certain groups (e.g. minorities, youths and residents of disadvantaged communities) and attempts to determined which groups are more or less likely to meet with officers to resolve police complaints. The data (obtained from the New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board and United States Census of 2010) allow for an analysis of complainant demographic characteristics and neighbourhood characteristics linked to the complainants. Bivariate and multivariate analyses uncovered group differences in mediation selection. Particularly, the results of this study demonstrate that minorities are more likely to select mediation.
Reference31 articles.
1. Alexander, M. (2010) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403410382450
2. Bell, D. (1979) Police and public opinion. Journal of Police Science and Administration 7(2): 196–205.
3. Berger, V. (2000). Civilians versus police: mediation can help to bridge the divide. Negotiation Journal 16: 221–35.
4. Blumstein, A. (1995) Violence by young people: why the deadly nexus. National Institute of Justice Journal 229: 3–9.
5. Browning, S., Cullen, F., Kopache, R. and Stevenson, T. (1994) Race and getting hassled by the police. Police Studies 17: 1–11.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献