The ethics of engagement

Author:

Atkins Sarah

Abstract

This paper considers the ethical dimensions of interprofessional research relationships in applied linguistics, an area that has perhaps received less attention than other types of engaged research in the field. As a discipline, applied linguistics has considered how research can be conducted ethically with participants, mindful of benefiting those who are the subjects of research. However, research in professional and institutional contexts involves complex relationships with multiple parties, where research ‘with’ different participants and professional groups raises ethical considerations about who benefits and who does not. A case study provided from a project in medical education, looking at differential attainment in an examination for UK general practitioners (GP), demonstrates these difficulties in a particularly politicised setting. Various relationships are examined in turn, from the early stages of becoming involved in local activity and establishing data collection, through to the involvement of ‘key informants’, analytic sessions with the practitioners and incorporating the perspectives of the GP trainees in developing educational interventions. Such relationships require negotiation between all parties, making it difficult for the researcher always to claim ‘independence’ and requiring ongoing ethical decisions about roles and obligations. Nevertheless, engaging in these relational activities is itself argued to be part of the ethical conduct for interprofessional research.

Publisher

Equinox Publishing

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education

Reference37 articles.

1. BAAL [British Association for Applied Linguistics] (2021) Recommendations on Good Practice in Applied Linguistics. Online: https://www.baal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BAAL-Good-Practice-Guidelines-2021.pdf

2. Beauchamp, Tom L. and James F. Childress (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Bernard, Harvey Russell (2018) Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

4. Brown, James D. (2004) Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics and standards. In Alan Davies and Catherine Elder (eds) The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 476–500. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

5. Bucholtz, Mary, Dolores Inés Casillas and Jin Sook Lee (2017) Beyond empowerment: Accompaniment and sociolinguistic justice in a youth research program. In Robert Lawson and Dave Sayers (eds) Sociolinguistic Research: Application and Impact, 25–44. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671765-3

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3