Mark’s Ending in the Digital Age

Author:

Monier Mina

Abstract

In approaching the classic problem of Mark’s ending, it has been assumed that there was no stone left unturned. However, the dawning of the digital age has proven otherwise. As part of the SNSF–funded project MARK16, I have studied the complex evidence of Mark 16’s textual transmission to understand the scribal textual decisions. This was followed by electronic transcription of the studied material as part of the digitization process. I will argue, in the first part, that the hitherto neglected paratexts and codicological remarks provide rich evidence on the dynamics of the Endings’ reception, conception and later transmission, being inextricably interwoven with patristic interpretation. As a result, I will provide two new witnesses to the Shorter Ending, embedded in a commentary text. In the second part, I will show how transmitting this complex evidence through electronic transcription is another stage in line with earlier scribal experience that problematizes established categories in scholarship.

Publisher

Equinox Publishing

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Aland, B. and K. Aland. 2012. Text Und Textwert Der Griechischen Handschriften Des Neuen Testaments IV. Band 1.2. Berlin: de Gruyter.

2. Aland, K. 1974. “Der Schluß des Markusevangeliums,” in L’Evangile Selon Marc. Tradition et Rédaction (BEThL 34), edited by M. Sabbé. Leuven: Presses universitaires, 435–470.

3. Allen, G. V. and A. P. Royle. 2020. “Paratexts Seeking Understanding: Manuscripts and Aesthetic Cognitivism.” Religions 11(10): 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100523

4. Andrist, P. 2016. “Structure and History of the Biblical Manuscripts Used by Erasmus for His 1516 Edition.” In Basel 1516: Erasmus’ Edition of the New Testament, edited by M. Wallraf, S. S. Menchi and K. von Greyerz, 81–124. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

5. ———. 2018. “Toward a Definition of Paratexts and Paratextuality: The Case of Ancient Greek Manuscripts.” In Bible as Notepad, edited by L. Lied, and M. Maniaci, 130–149.0 Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110603477-010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3