Anthropological Case Studies As Research Design For Intercultural Theology

Author:

Jara J Daniel

Abstract

This article explores the suitability of anthropological Case Studies (CSs) as a research design for research related to intercultural theology. The introduction refers briefly to the crisis of modernity’s missiological paradigm and the emergence of contextual theologies and intercultural theology as responses. It subsequently focuses on the ambivalent historical relationship between anthropological research and theological endeavors and the current relevance of culture studies for theological research. The following section targets the characteristics and aims of CSs and their nature as a research design rather than a method, along with the nature of the cases, their types, and their selection criteria. It also evaluates the possibilities of CSs as a research design for intercultural theology with special attention to two “research styles”: action research and participatory action research. The main criticisms of the CS design (reliability, internal validity, and transferability) as well as the comparison issue among cases are explained. Finally, this describes how the conjunction of theological research and models from cultural studies transcends a purely practical approach, implying the epistemological and even ontological postulates that sustain both disciplines.

Publisher

Equinox Publishing

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Religious studies

Reference62 articles.

1. Anderson, Allan. 1993. Tumelo: The Faith of African Pentecostals in South Africa. Pretoria: University of South Africa Press.

2. Arzaluz, Socorro. 2005.“La utilización del estudio de caso en el análisis local.” Religión y Sociedad 17(32): 107–144. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2005.32.a601

3. Bell, John et al. 2004. “Comparative Similarities and Differences between Action Research, Participative Research, and Participatory Action Research.” https://arlecchino.org/ildottore/mwsd/group2final-comparison.html

4. Bennett, Z. et al. 2018. Invitation to Research in Practical Theology. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351068246

5. Bergold, Jarg, and Stefan Thomas. 2012. “Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 13(1): 191–222.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3