Author:
Thomas Aled,Graham-Hyde Edward
Abstract
Recent years have seen an apparent “return” of normative religious and cultic language in political and media discourses, often adopted in pejorative and confrontational contexts. Arguably driven by contemporary political divisions and debates surrounding COVID-19 restrictions, terms including “cult,” “brainwashing,” and “groupthink” have reignited discourses surrounding so-called “cultic” behaviour and beliefs. We argue, however, that the “cult debate” has not returned, but rather transitioned into new and implicit conversations surrounding “good” and “bad” religion. In this special issue of Implicit Religion, we seek to avoid re-treading old ground concerning definitions of “cults,” and instead adopt a renewed approach to the academic study of normative cultic language—placing an emphasis on the ways in which these terms are used, negotiated, and understood in contemporary discourses.
Reference10 articles.
1. Barker, E. 1984. The Making of a Moonie: Brainwashing or Choice? Oxford: Blackwell.
2. ———. 2014. “The Not-So-New Religious Movements: Changes in ‘the Cult Scene’ Over the Past Forty Years.” Temenos: Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion 50(2): 235–256. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.48461
3. ———. 2017. “The Changing Scene: What Might Happen and What Might be Less Likely to Happen?” In Visioning New and Minority Religions, edited by E. V. Gallagher, 7–19. Oxon: Routledge.
4. Chryssides, G. D. 1994. “New Religious Movements—Some Problems of Definition.” Diskus 2(2).
5. Fitzgerald, T. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. “I Believe in Bees”;Implicit Religion;2023-11-17