Abstract
John Muir continues to influence Americans to see the natural world as replete with sacred value. Yet Muir’s work is not without its shadow side: Muir’s racism against Indigenous peoples permeates his writing. I locate both the valuable and vile views inherent in Muir’s moral vision in his uncritical reliance on Romantic epistemology, and particularly the recourse Muir continually made to the power of his intuition. Applying insights from G. W. F. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, I offer an account of the various roles Muir’s intuitions played in his thinking so as to better contextualize the best and worst features of his moral thought.
Subject
Religious studies,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Cultural Studies
Reference61 articles.
1. Adams, Marilyn M. 1999. Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
2. Adams, Robert M. 1999. Finite and Infinite Goods (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).
3. Attfield, Robin. 1981. ‘The Good of Trees’, The Journal of Value Inquiry 15 (January): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136626
4. Beiser, Frederick. 1995. ‘Hegel, a Non-Metaphysician! A Polemic’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 16.2: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263523200005504
5. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1996. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (New York, NY: Anchor Books).