Abstract
Until recently, popular presumption and scholarly consensus have cautioned against using Emerson as a constructive resource for eco-justice. Emerson’s views of nature, race, and gender as well as his involvement in the abolitionist and women’s movements of the nineteenth century have been a source of ongoing debate. At a time when concerns about social justice and equity have rightly become prominent in eco-justice, scholars of theology, religion, and ecology may wonder whether Ralph Waldo Emerson is best used, if at all, as a foil. Emerson’s anthropology and his reception history are both, at points, deficient. Nevertheless, because justice and love are central to his theological anthropology, he provides a resource for thinking about right relations among human beings and thenatural world. This anthropology provides a way beyond the false binary between anthropocentrism and ecocentrism that continues to haunt environmental ethics.
Subject
Religious studies,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Cultural Studies
Reference56 articles.
1. Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, trans. Fathers of The English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers and Christian Classics).
2. Argersinger, Jana L., and Phyllis Cole. 2014. Toward a Female Genealogy of Transcendentalism (Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press).
3. Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 2nd edn.).
4. Bilgrami, Akeel. 2014. Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
5. Bowlin, John R., and Andrew Latham. n.d. ‘Is the Common Good Obsolete?’, Commonweal Magazine. https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/common-good-obsolete