Affiliation:
1. Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, Texas 752443, USA
Abstract
A molecular physics-based complementary model, which includes both field-induced and current-induced degradation mechanisms, is used to help resolve the E versus 1/E time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) model controversy that has existed for many years. The Complementary Model indicates either the E or 1/E–TDDB model can be valid for certain specified field, temperature, and molecular bonding-energy ranges. For bond strengths <3 eV, the bond breakage rate is generally dominated by field-enhanced thermal processes at lower fields and elevated temperatures where the E-model is valid. At higher fields, lower temperatures and higher bond strengths the bond breakage mechanism must be hole-catalyzed and the TDDB physics is described well by the 1/E-model. Neither the E-model nor 1/E-model works well for oxide thickness below tox < 4 nm where direct tunneling effects dominate in these hyper-thin films. The increase in DT leakage leads to more hole injection and trapping in the SiO 2. This enhanced dielectric degradation rate with tox reduction can be easily incorporated into the Complementary Model where hole capture serves to catalyze Si–O bond breakage.
Publisher
World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Hardware and Architecture,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献