Cultural Algorithms as a Framework for the Design of Trustable Evolutionary Algorithms

Author:

Al-Tirawi Anas1,Reynolds Robert G.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA

2. Museum of Anthropological Archaeology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48201, USA

Abstract

One of the major challenges facing Artificial Intelligence in the future is the design of trustworthy algorithms. The development of trustworthy algorithms will be a key challenge in Artificial Intelligence for years to come. Cultural Algorithms (CAs) are viewed as one framework that can be employed to produce a trustable evolutionary algorithm. They contain features to support both sustainable and explainable computation that satisfy requirements for trustworthy algorithms proposed by Cox [Nine experts on the single biggest obstacle facing AI and algorithms in the next five years, Emerging Tech Brew, January 22, 2021]. Here, two different configurations of CAs are described and compared in terms of their ability to support sustainable solutions over the complete range of dynamic environments, from static to linear to nonlinear and finally chaotic. The Wisdom of the Crowds method was selected for the one configuration since it has been observed to work in both simple and complex environments and requires little long-term memory. The Common Value Auction (CVA) configuration was selected to represent those mechanisms that were more data centric and required more long-term memory content. Both approaches were found to provide sustainable performance across all the dynamic environments tested from static to chaotic. Based upon the information collected in the Belief Space, they produced this behavior in different ways. First, the topologies that they employed differed in terms of the “in degree” for different complexities. The CVA approach tended to favor reduced “indegree/outdegree”, while the WM exhibited a higher indegree/outdegree in the best topology for a given environment. These differences reflected the fact the CVA had more information available for the agents about the network in the Belief Space, whereas the agents in the WM had access to less available knowledge. It therefore needed to spread the knowledge that it currently had more widely throughout the population.

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Linguistics and Language,Information Systems,Software

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3