Gaussian Discriminant Analysis for Optimal Delineation of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease

Author:

Fang Chen1,Li Chunfei1,Cabrerizo Mercedes1,Barreto Armando1,Andrian Jean1,Rishe Naphtali1,Loewenstein David234,Duara Ranjan245,Adjouadi Malek145

Affiliation:

1. Center for Advanced Technology and Education (CATE), Florida International University, 10555 W Flagler St., Miami, Florida 33174, USA

2. Wien Center for Alzheimer’s Disease & Memory Disorders, Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach, Florida 33140, USA

3. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33136, USA

4. Florida Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA

5. Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33174, USA

Abstract

Over the past few years, several approaches have been proposed to assist in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and its prodromal stage of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Using multimodal biomarkers for this high-dimensional classification problem, the widely used algorithms include Support Vector Machines (SVM), Sparse Representation-based classification (SRC), Deep Belief Networks (DBN) and Random Forest (RF). These widely used algorithms continue to yield unsatisfactory performance for delineating the MCI participants from the cognitively normal control (CN) group. A novel Gaussian discriminant analysis-based algorithm is thus introduced to achieve a more effective and accurate classification performance than the aforementioned state-of-the-art algorithms. This study makes use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data uniquely as input to two separate high-dimensional decision spaces that reflect the structural measures of the two brain hemispheres. The data used include 190 CN, 305 MCI and 133 AD subjects as part of the AD Big Data DREAM Challenge #1. Using 80% data for a 10-fold cross-validation, the proposed algorithm achieved an average F1 score of 95.89% and an accuracy of 96.54% for discriminating AD from CN; and more importantly, an average F1 score of 92.08% and an accuracy of 90.26% for discriminating MCI from CN. Then, a true test was implemented on the remaining 20% held-out test data. For discriminating MCI from CN, an accuracy of 80.61%, a sensitivity of 81.97% and a specificity of 78.38% were obtained. These results show significant improvement over existing algorithms for discriminating the subtle differences between MCI participants and the CN group.

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,General Medicine

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3