Muscle Belly Repair: Biomechanical Assessment of the Anchor Suture and the Modified Kessler Techniques

Author:

JULIEN Terrill P.1,LI Guoan2,MUDGAL Chaitanya S.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, District of Columbia and Southern Maryland, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, P.C., USA

2. Orthopaedic Bioengineering Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA

3. Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Orthopaedic Hand Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Background: Treatment of muscle belly lacerations remains a problem for surgeons. Inadequate repair of lacerations can cause functional disability. To date, there is no consensus on the method of repair for these injuries. We have previously described a technique of repairing mid-substance muscle belly lacerations. The aim of this study was to determine the ultimate strength of an intact muscle belly and to compare the anchor suture (AS) technique with the modified Kessler (MK) technique. Methods: Fifteen fresh frozen hind-legs from adolescent pigs were divided into three groups and used for the testing. Each group consisted of five specimens. Group one was the intact control group, group two was repaired with the MK technique and group three was repaired with the AS technique. Following repair, the muscles were secured in a custom-made fixation apparatus and underwent linear tensioning at a rate of 25 mm/min, generating a load-displacement curve for each specimen. The data regarding ultimate strength, modes of failure and number of intact suture/anchor constructs (for groups 2 and 3) was calculated. Results: The ultimate strength of the intact muscle group of was found to be 608.1 ± 107.9  N. This was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the pull-out strength of the MK and AS groups. The pull-out strength of the AS group was 143.1 ± 36.7 N, nearly twice that of the MK group 69.8 ± 16.4 N (p = 0.11). Suture pull-out was the most common mode of failure. Conclusions: The AS technique was found to have both higher strain and nearly twice the ultimate pull-out strength compared to the MK repair group. We suggest the AS technique as a viable technique for mid-substance muscle belly repairs.

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3