Ulnar-Sided Upper Extremity Traumatic Wounds: What Should We Expect to Find?

Abstract

Background: Upper limb traumatic injuries have a significant impact on social and professional life; however, there is still a paucity of studies focusing on the injuries of the ulnar border of the forearm, wrist and hand. Methods: We designed a retrospective single-blinded study, including all patients with deep traumatic wounds affecting the ulnar side of the forearm, wrist or hand, that received surgical treatment from 2006 until 2016. A characterisation of the sample, assessment of concomitant injuries and clinical outcomes, as well as neurological and functional evaluation were performed. Results: We obtained a sample of 61 patients, 69% with injuries affecting the wrist and 90% of patients with a neurological lesion, most frequently of the ulnar nerve lesion (UNL). Concomitant injuries included tendinous lesions, more frequently of the flexor carpi ulnaris (64%) and fractures (13%). And 39% of patients presented an ulnar artery lesion, without significant differences in outcomes regarding the completion of arteriorrhaphy or not. At the end of the 8.6 years follow-up, 34% of patients had no deficits; however, patients with UNL showed worse functional scores and greater risk of sequelae. Besides motor function compromise, sensory deficits were also associated with worst functional outcomes. Conclusions: The UNL subgroup showed important impairment of the first ray, probably related to the level of UNL. Furthermore, besides the implications of the motor sequelae, sensory deficits were also associated with worst functional scores. Due to the high percentage of neurovascular and tendinous lesions in ulnar-sided upper extremity wounds, the authors recommend surgical exploration of these lesions. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)