Interactive Visualization for Group Decision Analysis

Author:

Bajracharya S.1,Carenini G.1,Chamberlain B.2,Chen K.1,Klein D.3,Poole D.1,Taheri H.3,Öberg G.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4, Canada

2. Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Utah State University, USA

3. Institute for Resources, Environment, and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4, Canada

Abstract

Identifying the best solutions to large infrastructure decisions is a context-dependent multi-dimensional multi-stakeholder challenge in which competing objectives must be identified and trade-offs made. Our aim is to identify and explore features in an interactive visualization tool to help make group decision analysis more participatory, transparent, and comprehensible. We extended the interactive visualization tool ValueCharts to create Group ValueCharts. The new tool was introduced in two real-world scenarios in which stakeholders were in the midst of wrestling with decisions about infrastructure investment. We modeled the alternatives under consideration, for both scenarios, using prescribed criteria identified by domain experts. Participants in both groups were given instructions on how to use the tool to represent their preferences. Preferences for all participants were then displayed and discussed. The discussions were audio-recorded and the participants were surveyed to evaluate usability. The results indicate that participants felt the tool improved group interaction and information exchange and made the discussion more participatory. They expressed that visualizing individual preferences improved the ability to analyze decision outcomes based on everyone’s preferences. Additionally, the participants strongly concurred that the tool revealed disagreements and agreements and helped identify sticking points. These results suggest that a group decision tool that allows group members to input their individual preferences and then collectively probe into any differences makes the process of decision-making more participatory, transparent, and comprehensible and increases the quality and quantity of information exchange.

Funder

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

BC Real Estate Foundation

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference46 articles.

1. Societal systems – Complex or worse?

2. A New Planning and Design Paradigm to Achieve Sustainable Resource Recovery from Wastewater

3. V. A. Brown, J. A. Harris and J. Y. Russel , Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination, Earthscan (2010), pp. 3–16.

4. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3