Assimilation of Pair-Wise Comparison Method to Decide Weights of Features Based on the Content of Image

Author:

Rout Narendra Kumar1,Atulkar Mithilesh1,Ahirwal Mitul Kumar2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Application, NIT, Raipur 492010(C.G), India

2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, MANIT, Bhopal 462003(M.P.), India

Abstract

Computer-based image recognition systems rely on training with an initial training set to recognize similar images. However, when such training set is not available, individual features within a given image can be used to identify and compare with congruent features in database to find similarity among images. An experiment is implemented for extracting similar images using this technique of computer-based image recognition. For this study multiple features color, shape and texture have been extracted from Corel 10k database images. After manual selection of individual feature weightage, all features with equal weightage have been used to identify similar images from database. After observing class wise average precision and average recall of Corel 10k database images, it has been found that equal weightage approach yields satisfactory results and also better as compared with individual feature approach in maximum number of classes. In some of the classes, results are not satisfactory with equal weightage approach. In these classes, results vary with weights of feature according to nature of image. The average precision and recall of entire classes are 96.62% based on all feature equal weight. Now, the problem is to decide weights of features. For this, this study proposes the automatic determination of the weightage for features using pair-wise comparison method. The problem is formulated as multiple criteria decision-making (MCMD) problem and solved through analytic hierarchical process (AHP). Graphical user interface (GUI) is also designed. The proposed approach determines color dominant, shape dominant and texture dominant based on importance on respective features. The average precision and recall of 95 classes are 100% in all dominant features. The average precision and recall of remaining five classes are 59%, 53% and 46% in color dominant, shape dominant and texture dominant, respectively. Performance measure shows that the proposed method archives better results as compared to manual assignment of weights of features.

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd

Subject

General Medicine,Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3