Do Algorithmic Traders Improve Liquidity When Information Asymmetry is High?

Author:

Jain Archana1,Jain Chinmay23ORCID,Khanapure Revansiddha Basavaraj4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA

2. SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454, USA

3. Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4 Canada

4. Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Rd, JSOM 14.218, Richardson, TX 75080, USA

Abstract

Hendershott et al. (2011, Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? Journal of Finance 66, 1–33) show that algorithmic traders improve liquidity in equity markets. An equally important and unanswered question is whether they improve liquidity when information asymmetry is high. We use days surrounding earnings announcement as a period of high information asymmetry. First, we follow Hendershott et al. (2011, Does Algorithmic Trading Improve Liquidity? Journal of Finance 66, 1–33) to use introduction of NYSE autoquote as a natural experiment. We find that increased algorithmic trading (AT) as a result of NYSE autoquote does not improve liquidity around earnings announcements. Next, we use trade-to-order volume % and cancel rate as a proxy for algorithmic trading and find that abnormal spreads surrounding the days of earnings announcement are significantly higher for stocks with higher AT. Our findings indicate that algorithmic traders reduces their role of liquidity provision in markets when information asymmetry is high. These findings shed further light on the role of liquidity provision by algorithmic traders in the financial markets.

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt

Subject

Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using bibliometrics to understand algorithmic finance;Journal of Applied Economics;2024-08-08

2. Technology and automation in financial trading: A bibliometric review;Research in International Business and Finance;2024-08

3. Artificial intelligence in Finance: a comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis;SN Business & Economics;2024-01-20

4. TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION IN FINANCIAL TRADING: A BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW;2024

5. Literature Review on Algorithmic Trading in Financial Markets;2023 International Conference on Sustainable Islamic Business and Finance (SIBF);2023-09-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3