Affiliation:
1. School of Environmental and Information Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, New South Wales 2640, Australia
Abstract
One impact of the introduction of television, according to widely held views, is an undermining of traditional values and social organization. In this study, we simulate this process by representing social communication as a Random Boolean Network in which the individuals are nodes, and each node's state represents an opinion (yes/no) about some issue. Television is modelled as having a direct link to every node in the network. Two scenarios were considered. First, we found that, except in the most well connected networks, television rapidly breaks down cohesion (agreement in opinion). Second, the introduction of Hebbian learning leads to a polarizing effect : one subgroup strongly retains the original opinion, while a splinter group adopts the contrary opinion. The system displays criticality with respect to connectivity and the level of exposure to television. More generally, the results suggest that patterns of communication in networks can help to explain a wide variety of social phenomena.
Publisher
World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
Subject
Control and Systems Engineering
Reference15 articles.
1. Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence
2. B. H. Erickson, Social Structures: A Network Approach, The relational basis of attitudes, eds. B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988) pp. 99–121.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Social Networks;Networks in Society;2014-01-22
2. Dual-Phase Evolution;Dual Phase Evolution;2013-11-13
3. Polarized News Media and the Polarization of the Electorate;International Journal of Artificial Life Research;2010-01
4. Self-organization in Simulated Social Networks;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2009