A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MIPPO AND MDLIN APPLIED TO THE TREATMENT OF DISTAL TIBIAL FRACTURES

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the clinical treatment effects of the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and multi-directional locking intramedullary nail (MDLIN) techniques in patients with distal tibial fractures. Methods: A total of 124 patients with distal tibial fractures, admitted to the People’s Hospital of Zhongjiang County from February 2019 to January 2020, were selected as the research subjects. They were randomly divided into groups ([Formula: see text]). The control group received MIPPO treatment, the observation group received MDLIN treatment, and the postoperative therapeutic effects and complications in the two groups were compared. Results: The patients in the observation group had shorter operative time and lower intraoperative blood loss than those in the control group ([Formula: see text]). The two groups had no significant differences in fracture healing time, complete weight bearing time, or functional recovery. The postoperative complication rate in the cases of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group ([Formula: see text]). Conclusion: Both techniques can achieve sufficient therapeutic effects; however, the MDLIN technique has certain advantages, including significantly fewer complications, lower intraoperative blood loss, and shorter operative durations compared to the MIPPO technique.