A Tailored Method for Strategic Environmental Assessment in Maritime Spatial Planning

Author:

Calado Helena1,Gutierrez Débora2,Pegorelli Camila2,Kirkfeldt Trine Skovgaard3,Hipólito Claudia4567,Moniz Fabiana2,McClintock Will8,Vergílio Marta9,Guerreiro José56,Papaioannou Eva10

Affiliation:

1. UAc/FCT - MARE University of the Azores/Faculty of Science and Technology and Marine Environmental Sciences Centre, Ponta Delgada 9501-801, Portugal,

2. FGF/UAc/FCT – Fundação Gaspar Frutuoso, University of the Azores/Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Ponta Delgada 9501-801, Portugal

3. Centre for Blue Governance, Department of Planning, Aalborg University, A. C. Meyers Vaenge 15, Copenhagen 2450, Denmark

4. Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro 8005-135, Portugal

5. MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

6. Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

7. Centre of Applied Economics Studies of the Atlantic (CEEAplA), University of Azores, Ponta Delgada 9501-801, Portugal

8. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, US

9. CIBIO – Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources/InBIO – Associate Laboratory, University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada 9501-801, Portugal

10. GEOMAR – Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

Abstract

Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is used to identify the potential impacts of plans and policies such as maritime spatial planning (MSP). Studies have demonstrated ambiguity in SEA objectives and substantial knowledge gaps in existing and emerging SEA practices for MSP. The aim of this paper is to support a methodology for the development, implementation, and monitoring of SEA for MSP plans based on a stepwise, participatory mapping exercise by experts, using indicators to evaluate areas of conflicts/synergies in possible future scenarios. An overview of 16 proposed indicators identified a representative criterion. Participatory sector analyses were performed in three scenarios. Most conflicts focused on coastal areas, indicating that coastal planning should be a priority in all possible scenarios. The methodology developed in this paper uses GES indicators to perform the assessment of the three different scenarios and makes the development of a participatory mapping approach with experts in the very early stages of the process a more feasible alternative for a first assessment. This methodology was efficient in a collaborative SEA evaluation of MSPs to facilitate an ecosystem approach in an Azorean case study.

Funder

Political Scenarios in Maritime Spatial Planning for the Azores and North Atlantic

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3