Accuracy and efficiency comparison of the fluid flow and heat transfer simulations by discrete velocity models of LBM and FDLBM regardless of grid clustering

Author:

Tehrani Mohammadreza Saremi1ORCID,Ghadyani Mohsen1ORCID,Enjilela Vali2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanics, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the comparison of discrete velocity models (DVM) used for the simulation of heat transfer and fluid flows in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). In this study, the discrete velocity models of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in which particle velocity vectors are eight are used in simulating four benchmark problems. An enhancement in the stability of the single relaxation time (SRT) model for problems is facilitated by solving the continuous Boltzmann equation, and its application in efficiently addressing conductive heat transfer/fluid flow benchmark problems is expanded by utilizing the finite difference methods paired with the lattice Boltzmann method (FDLBM). To generalize the paper’s conclusion more accurately, the LBM with two-relaxation time (TRT-LBM) is included in all comparisons. A D2Q5 scheme is also considered to understand how it would address heat transfer problems compared to the ones presented. Moreover, an improvement in the accuracy of the FDLBM for some cases is assisted through the integration of the finite differentiation mechanism with the Runge–Kutta method. A series of unsteady and steady problems were numerically solved to validate the introduced methods. The outcomes affirmed that the proposed FDLBM algorithm procures more stable and robust results compared to those derived from the DVMs of SRT-LBM devoid of filtering techniques. Notably, the FDLBM method achieves this increased accuracy without introducing additional complexity to the SRT model by resorting to nonuniform grids. The decision to exclude more complex methods stems from their requirement for refined computational grids. To ascertain the numerical stability and accuracy of the devised algorithm, a comparative analysis was performed with analytical results or other numerical methods. The simulations underscored the efficacy of the current method, showcasing commendable harmony with analytical solutions and other numerical strategies.

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3