Embedding Best-Worst Method into Data Envelopment Analysis

Author:

Yu Yu1,Khezrimotlag Dariush2

Affiliation:

1. School of Business, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, P. R. China

2. School of Science, Engineering and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, USA

Abstract

In real-life applications, there generally exist Decision Makers (DMs) who have preferences over outputs and inputs. Choosing appropriate weights for different criteria by DMs often arises as a problem. The Best-Worst Method (BWM) in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) depends on very few pairwise comparisons and just needs DMs to identify the most desirable and the least desirable criteria. Unlike MCDM, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) does not generally assume a priority for an output (an input) over any other outputs (inputs). The link between DEA and MCDM can be introduced by considering Decision-Making Units (DMUs) as alternatives, outputs as criteria to be maximized, and inputs as criteria to be minimized. In this study, we propose a linear programming model to embed DEA and BWM appropriately. We first propose a modified BWM linear programming model to satisfy all conditions that DMs can assume. We then illustrate how a conventional DEA model can be developed to include the BWM conditions. From our approach, the MCDM problem to obtain the optimal weights of different criteria are measured. At the same time, the relative efficiency scores of DMUs corresponding to the MCDM criteria are also calculated. We provide the foundation of measuring the efficiency scores when most desirable and the least desirable inputs and outputs are known. To show the process of the proposed approach, a numerical example (including 17 DMUs with seven inputs and outputs) is also discussed.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Suzhou Key Laboratory for Big Data and Information Service

Publisher

World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Management Science and Operations Research

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3