AN UPDATE ON THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN AS A PRINCIPLE OF PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION IN EUROPEAN UNION

Author:

MLADENOV MARIJANA1,STOJŠIĆ DABETIĆ JELENA1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judicary in Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Abstract

Should we consider the right to be forgotten as a threat to free speech or the mechanism of the right to privacy? This most controversial element of the right to privacy and personal data protection caused the global debate on privacy and freedom of speech. Despite the fact that the right to be forgotten is codified in Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation and that fundamental postulates of this right were defined in Google v. Spain, there still remain unresolved issues. In order to gain a clear idea of the content of the right to be forgotten, as the principle of data protection in accordance with the latest European perspective, the subject matter of the paper refers to analyses of the developments of this right in the light of relevant regulations, as well as of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The article firstly provides an overview of the concept of the right to be forgotten, from the very early proposals that gave rise to it, to the latest ones contained in recent regulations. Furthermore, the special attention is devoted to the new standards of the concept of the right to be forgotten from the aspect of recent rulings of the CJEU, GC et al v. CNIL and CNIL v. Google. Within the concluding remarks, the authors highlight the need for theoretical innovation and an adequate legal framework of the right to be forgotten in order to fit this right within the sociotechnical legal culture. The goal of the article is to provide insight regarding the implementation of the right to be forgotten in the European Union and to identify the main challenges with respect to the issue.

Publisher

Kultura - Polis

Reference17 articles.

1. Castellano, Pere Simón. (2012), “The right to be forgotten under European Law: constitutional debate”, Lex Electronica 16 (1): 1–30.

2. Criscione, Hunter. 2020. “Forgetting the Right to Be Forgotten: The Everlasting Negative Implications of a Right to Be Dereferenced on Global Freedom in the Wake of Google v. CNIL, ” Pace International Law Review 32 (2): 315-358

3. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31–50.

4. GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), Case C-136/17, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 September 2019, ECLI:EU:C:2019:773.

5. Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL), Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 September 2019, Case C-507/17, ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2019:772.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3