IMPROVING THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY’S WORKING METHODS AS A POSSIBILITY OF ENDING ITS MARGINALIZATION

Author:

GORDANIĆ JELICA1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

The paper analyses improving the United Nations General Assembly’s working methods as one of the possibilities of ending its marginalization. The General Assembly is facing numerous difficulties, including an overburdened agenda, repetitive agenda items, the need for better working organization and non-implementation of resolutions by the member states. Among the UN member states there is consent to improve the General Assembly’s working methods, but also disagreements on mechanisms it can be achieved. In order to strengthen the role and competencies of the General Assembly, an ad hoc working group on the revitalization of the work of the General Assembly (the AHWG) was established in 1991. So far, the AHWG group had made some contributions in improving the General Assembly’s working methods. The paper aims to show that efforts of the AHWG, although significant, are not sufficient to solve all problems of working methods of the General Assembly. The author concludes that the only effective way in solving the working methods of the General Assembly is the UN Charter revision.

Publisher

Kultura - Polis

Reference24 articles.

1. Bailey, Sydney D. 1960. The General Assembly of the United Nations. A study of Procedure and Practice. London: Stevens & Sons Limited.

2. Cassel, Douglas. 2005. “Introduction and Postscript: Partial Progress on UN Reform” Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights IV (1): 1–5.

3. Global Policy Forum. 2003. “General Assembly Reform: Mission of the Netherlands to the United Nations.” 26 October 2003. https://archive.globalpolicy.org/reform/topics/ga/2003/1026nethreport.htm последњи проступ 02.04.2021.

4. Горданић, Јелица. 2020. „Јачање улоге Генералне скупштине Уједињених нација у процесу избора генералног секретара – између потребе и могућности“ Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду LIV (2): 781–801.

5. Maresca, Alex. 2014. “Report on the Second Thematic Meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly” Center for UN Reform Education. https://centerforunreform.org/2014/07/24/report-on-the-second-thematic-meeting-of-the-ad-hoc-working-group-on-the-revitalization-of-the-work-of-the-general-assembly/ последњи приступ 06.04.2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3