Affiliation:
1. School of Business, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052;
2. Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 *Corresponding author
Abstract
Using Ghemawat’s AAA framework, we distinguish between different types of activities—aggregation, adaptation, and arbitrage—that firms can pursue when operating abroad and empirically examine the distribution and combinations of these activities by U.S. multinationals. Taking a question-based approach, we develop empirical measures of these activities and then examine their prevalence, their correlates, their association with firm performance, and differences across industries in the population of U.S. multinational corporations (MNCs) from 1989 to 2014. Though only a small proportion of U.S. MNCs actively pursue aggregation, adaptation, and arbitrage together, our results show that this combination is most strongly associated with firm performance, especially in industries with high technological intensity. Overall, our study highlights the need to take the heterogeneity of activities MNCs pursue into account when examining multinationality while also providing one of the first large-scale quantitative examinations of the different combinations of Ghemawat’s three approaches to global value creation.
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献