The Secretary Problem with Independent Sampling

Author:

Correa José1ORCID,Cristi Andrés2ORCID,Feuilloley Laurent3ORCID,Oosterwijk Tim4ORCID,Tsigonias-Dimitriadis Alexandros5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Chile;

2. Center for Mathematical Modeling, Universidad de Chile, Chile;

3. CNRS, INSA Lyon, UCBL, LIRIS, UMR5205, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France;

4. School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands;

5. European Central Bank, 60314 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Abstract

The secretary problem is probably the most well-studied optimal stopping problem with many applications in economics and management. In the secretary problem, a decision maker faces an unknown sequence of values, revealed successively, and has to make irrevocable take-it-or-leave-it decisions. Her goal is to select the maximum value in the sequence. Although in the classic secretary problem the values of upcoming elements are entirely unknown, in many realistic situations, the decision maker has access to some information, for example, from past data. In this paper, we take a sampling approach and assume that before starting the sequence, each element is sampled independently with probability p. We study both the adversarial and the random arrival models. Our main result is to obtain the best possible algorithms for both settings and all values of p. As p grows to one, the obtained guarantees converge to the optimal guarantees in the full information case. Notably, we establish that the best possible algorithm in the adversarial order setting is a fixed threshold algorithm. In the random order setting, we characterize the best possible algorithm by a sequence of thresholds, dictating at which point in time we should accept a value. Surprisingly, this sequence is independent of p. We complement our theoretical results with numerical experiments on data of people playing the secretary problem repeatedly. Our results help explain some behavioral issues they raised and indicate that people play a strategy similar to our optimal algorithms from the start onwards, albeit slightly suboptimally. This paper was accepted by Chung Piaw Teo, optimization. Funding: This work was partially funded by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Chile [Grants FB210005 (Centro de Modelamiento Matamático), AIM23_0004 (Millenium Institute for Research in Market Imperfections and Public Policy), AFB230002 (Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingeniería), ACT210005, and Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1220054], the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation with funds from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, and the German Research Foundation within the Research Training Group Advanced Optimization in a Networked Economy [Grant Graduiertenkolleg 2201]. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank or the Eurosystem. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.01580 .

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3