Attracting the Sharks: Corporate Innovation and Securities Class Action Lawsuits

Author:

Kempf Elisabeth123ORCID,Spalt Oliver45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, Illinois 60637;

2. Centre for Economic Policy and Research, London EC1V 0DX, United Kingdom;

3. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138;

4. Business School, University of Mannheim, 68131 Mannheim, Germany;

5. European Corporate Governance Institute, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

This paper provides novel evidence suggesting that securities class action lawsuits, a central pillar of the U.S. litigation and corporate governance system, can constitute an obstacle to valuable corporate innovation. We first establish that valuable innovation output makes firms particularly vulnerable to costly low-quality class action litigation. Exploiting judge turnover in federal courts, we then show that changes in class action litigation risk affect the value and number of patents filed, suggesting firms take into account that risk in their innovation decisions. A new perspective we provide is that innovation success, not only innovation failure, can increase firms’ securities class action litigation risk. This paper was accepted by Victoria Ivashina, finance. Funding: E. Kempf gratefully acknowledges financial support from the James S. Kemper Foundation at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Supplemental Material: Data and the internet appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4388 .

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management

Reference46 articles.

1. Abrams D, Akcigit U, Grennan J (2019) Patent value and citations: Creative destruction or strategic disruption? NBER Working Paper 19647, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

2. Do the Merits Matter? A Study of Settlements in Securities Class Actions

3. Securities Price Consequences of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Related Events

4. Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry

5. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Shades of grey: Risk-related agency conflicts and corporate innovation;Journal of Corporate Finance;2023-12

2. The merits of securities litigation and corporate reputation;Contemporary Accounting Research;2023-11-06

3. Ex-ante litigation risk and firm-level climate-change exposure;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization;2023-10

4. Political ideology and judicial administration: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic;The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization;2023-09-27

5. Does Shareholder Litigation Risk Cause Public Firms to Delist? Evidence from Securities Class Action Lawsuits;Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis;2023-04-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3