Undisclosed SEC Investigations

Author:

Blackburne Terrence1,Kepler John D.2,Quinn Phillip J.3ORCID,Taylor Daniel4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Business, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331;

2. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305;

3. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattlle, Washington 98195;

4. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of the Security and Exchange Commision's (SEC's) investigative process is that it is shrouded in secrecy––only the SEC staff, high-level managers of the company being investigated, and outside counsel are typically aware of active investigations. We obtain novel data on all investigations closed by the SEC between 2000 and 2017––data that were heretofore nonpublic––and find that such investigations predict economically material declines in future firm performance. Despite evidence that the vast majority of these investigations are economically material, firms are not required to disclose them, and only 19% of investigations are initially disclosed. We examine whether corporate insiders exploit the undisclosed nature of these investigations for personal gain. Despite the undisclosed and economically material nature of these investigations, we find that insiders are not abstaining from trading. In particular, we find a pronounced spike in insider selling among undisclosed investigations with the most severe negative outcomes; and that abnormal selling activity appears highly opportunistic and earns significant abnormal returns. Our results suggest that SEC investigations are often undisclosed, economically material nonpublic events, and that insiders are trading in conjunction with these events. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting.

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Partisan bias in securities enforcement;The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization;2024-08-27

2. The Effect of the Federal Judicial System on Public Enforcement: Evidence from SEC Enforcement Actions;Journal of Accounting Research;2024-08-22

3. Do Proprietary Costs Deter Insider Trading?;Management Science;2024-07-12

4. Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable;Management Science;2024-07

5. Firm Boundaries and Voluntary Disclosure;The Accounting Review;2024-06-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3