Distributed Ledgers and Secure Multiparty Computation for Financial Reporting and Auditing

Author:

Cao Sean Shun1ORCID,Cong Lin William23ORCID,Yang Baozhong4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Accounting, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20740;

2. Finance, SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853;

3. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138;

4. Finance, J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30342

Abstract

To understand the disruption and implications of distributed ledger technologies for financial reporting and auditing, we analyze firm misreporting, auditor monitoring and competition, and regulatory policy in a unified model. A federated blockchain for financial reporting and auditing can improve verification efficiency not only for transactions in private databases but also for cross-chain verifications through privacy-preserving computation protocols. Despite the potential benefit of blockchains, private incentives for firms and first-mover advantages for auditors can create inefficient under-adoption or partial adoption that favors larger auditors. Although a regulator can help coordinate the adoption of technology, endogenous choice of transaction partners by firms can still lead to adoption failure. Our model also provides an initial framework for further studies of the costs and implications of the use of distributed ledgers and secure multiparty computation in financial reporting, including the positive spillover to discretionary auditing and who should bear the cost of adoption. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, finance. Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge research support from the FinTech Laboratory at J. Mack Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University, the Center for Research in Security Prices at the University of Chicago, the Ripple University Blockchain Research Initiative, and the Smith AI Initiative for Capital Market Research at the University of Maryland. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.02577 .

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3