Is Separately Modeling Subpopulations Beneficial for Sequential Decision-Making?

Author:

Lee Ilbin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R6, Canada

Abstract

When applying decision models, we often estimate input parameters using data. In healthcare and some other applications, data are collected from a population of different entities, such as patients. Thus, one faces a modeling question of whether to estimate different models for subpopulations (called stratifying). The potential benefit of stratifying comes from the heterogeneity of subpopulations. For example, patients who progress faster than others require a separate model and a tailored treatment plan. In “Is Separately Modeling Subpopulations Beneficial for Sequential Decision-Making?,” Lee provides theoretical results and empirical methods for deciding whether to stratify subpopulations. The article also presents how to use its results to select the best stratification among many. Improving medical decisions by tailoring to each subpopulation is a building block of precision medicine, and thus, this work aligns closely with the precision medicine paradigm.

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Computer Science Applications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3