Affiliation:
1. A. B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118;
2. Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
Abstract
Technology and intellectual property play increasingly critical roles in emerging supply chains by endowing products with sought-after capabilities. In such technology-intensive supply chains, the technology invented by an upstream firm must be embedded in a subsystem that is then integrated into a full system. The technology providers’ prevalent royalty-driven business model has gotten complicated in this multilateral supply chain, prompting formal research attention. Moreover, providers also consider forward integration into manufacturing to monetize their intellectual property. We characterize the appropriateness of different business model decisions for markets, which may have varying levels of consumer diversity and competitive intensity at intermediate layers. For the technology provider, our key results show that a subsystem base royalty approach is the optimal business model when dealing with monopolistic intermediaries or having a low degree of consumer diversity. However, a full-system base royalty business model becomes increasingly optimal when the intermediate supply chains face competition and consumer diversity increases. We present conditions under which the technology provider may want to forward integrate. Our formulation and results are relevant to technology providers, policy makers, and industry groups engaged in the prevailing heated global discussion on royalty base. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management.
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Strategy and Management
Reference45 articles.
1. Product quality selection: Contractual agreements and supplier competition in an assemble-to-order environment
2. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
3. Bartz D (2009) U.S. battle over patent reform headed for compromise? Reuters (March 10), www.reuters.com/article/2009/03/10/us-patents-idUSTRE5295J920090310.
4. Bartz D, Nellis S (2017) Apple files $1 billion lawsuit against chip supplier Qualcomm. Reuters (January 20), http://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-lawsuit-qualcomm-idUSKBN1542SG.
5. Risk sharing in licensing
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献