Fairness Regulation of Prices in Competitive Markets

Author:

Yang Zongsen1ORCID,Fu Xingyu2ORCID,Gao Pin1ORCID,Chen Ying-Ju3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Data Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China;

2. School of Marketing, University of New South Wales Business School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia;

3. School of Business and Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong

Abstract

Problem definition: The loyalty penalty refers to a pricing strategy where companies charge higher prices to loyal customers for exploitation while offering lower prices to nonloyal customers for attraction. To address this unfair business practice, various regulatory agencies, such as the Competition and Markets Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom, have proposed or implemented regulations aimed at promoting fairness in pricing. In this study, we analyze the impact of such regulations on both firms and consumers. Methodology/results: We develop a stylized model to investigate duopoly competition in two symmetric markets, where consumers exhibit loyalty to different firms in each market. The regulatory intervention mandates that the price difference between the two markets, set by each firm, must not exceed a certain threshold. Our analysis reveals an intriguing interaction between market competition and price fairness regulation. When competition is intense, fairness regulation can alleviate cutthroat competition between firms, resulting in Pareto improvements compared with a scenario with no regulation. On the other hand, when competition is weak, fairness regulation can further enhance firms’ existing monopoly power, potentially leading to collusive high prices that are detrimental to consumers and society. We also consider several extensions to enrich our findings, including fairness regulation on relative price discounts, asymmetric markets, and a two-pronged policy regulating the price gap and price cap. Managerial implications: Our study reveals the economic consequences of price fairness regulations; firms can benefit by pricing fairly, but well-intended fairness requirements may have adverse effects on consumers. Funding: P. Gao is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72201234 and 72192805], the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (the Collaborative Research Fund) [Grant C6032-21G], and the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mathematical Foundations for Artificial Intelligence [Grant 2023B1212010001]. Y.-J. Chen acknowledges financial support from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council [Grants CRF HKUST C6020-21GF, GRF 16500821, and GRF 16501722]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0552 .

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3