Preference–Approval Structures in Group Decision Making: Axiomatic Distance and Aggregation

Author:

Dong Yucheng1ORCID,Li Yao1ORCID,He Ying2ORCID,Chen Xia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Network Big Data and Decision-Making, Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

2. Department of Business and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5230, Denmark

Abstract

Preference–approval structure combines the preference information of both ranking and approval, which extends the ordinal preference model by incorporating two categories of choice alternatives, that is, acceptable (good) and unacceptable (bad), in the preference modeling process. In this study, we present some axioms that imply the existence of a unique distance function of preference–approval structures. Based on theoretical analysis and simulation experiments, we further study a preferences aggregation model in the group decision-making context based on the proposed axiomatic distance function. In this model, the group preference is defined as a preference–approval structure that minimizes the sum of its distances to all preference–approval structures of individuals in the group under consideration. Particularly, we show that the group preference defined by the axiomatic distance–based aggregation model has close relationships with the simple majority rule and Cook and Seiford’s ranking.

Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Subject

General Decision Sciences

Reference31 articles.

1. Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation: The Case of Ties

2. Arrow KJ (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

3. Preference structures I: Distances between transitive preference relations†

4. Preference Structures. II: Distances Between Asymmetric Relations

5. Borda JC (1784) Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Academie des Sciences, ed. Historie de l’Academie Royale des Sciences pour 1781 (Imprimerie Royale, Paris), 657–665.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3