Abstract
Is it necessary to have a notion of transcendence, a traditional metaphysics, to defend the human? This article addresses this question through an interpretation of the texture and rhythm of Szymborska’s language. Her poems are multi-faceted, and often playful, but it is difficult to ignore the poet’s insistence on ethics, despite the utter indifference of the natural world to good and evil. Humans are themselves a part of the natural world, and thus, if, like Szymborska, one does not accept a reality beyond nature, the strangeness of the ethical demand, which appears groundless, becomes shorn of any possible explanation. In the conclusion of the essay, the researcher puts Szymborska’s view of ethics in conversation with Emmanuel Levinas, whose position resembles hers and yet also sheds a new light on what the groundlessness of ethics might mean.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Literature and Literary Theory,History,Cultural Studies
Reference22 articles.
1. Barańczak S., The Americanization of Wisława; or How I Was Translating ‘An Opinion on the Question of Pornography’ with One Young Californian, [in:] A. Nasiłowska [ed.], Wisława Szymborska’s Poetry: Choice of Essays, tr. K. Krasuska and J. Burszta, New York 2015.
2. Bojanowska E., Wisława Szymborska: Naturalist and Humanist, “Slavic and Eastern European Journal” 1997, v. 41:2.
3. Carpenter B., Wisława Szymborska and the Importance of the Unimportant, “World Literature Today” 1997, vol. 71, no 1.
4. Cavanagh C., Poetry and Ideology: The Example of Wisława Szymborska, “Literary Imagination: The Review of the Association of Literary Scholars and Critics” 1999, vol. 1, iss. 2.
5. Cohen R.A. [ed.], Face to Face with Levinas, Albany 1986.