Imaging of cervical cancer. Consensus of experts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Imaging of cervical cancer. Consensus of experts

Published:2023-12-01 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2408-9516
Container-title:Medical Visualization
language:
Short-container-title:Medicinskaâ vizualizaciâ

Author:

Rubtsova N. A.¹^ORCID,Berezovskaia T. P.²^ORCID,Bychenko V. G.³^ORCID,Pavlovskaya E. A.⁴^ORCID,Solopova A. E.³^ORCID,Agababyan T. A.²^ORCID,Khodzhibekova M. M.¹^ORCID,Ryzhkova D. V.⁵,Chekalova M. A.⁶^ORCID,Meshkova I. E.⁴^ORCID,Gazhonova V. E.⁷^ORCID,Gus A. I.³^ORCID,Bagnenko S. S.⁴^ORCID,Medvedeva B. M.⁸^ORCID,Ashrafyan L. A.³^ORCID,Novikova E. G.¹^ORCID,Berlev I. V.⁴^ORCID,Demidova L. V.¹^ORCID,Krikunova L. I.²^ORCID,Kolomiets L. A.⁹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute – Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

2. A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC)

3. Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named by V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

4. N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology

5. Almazov National Medical Research Centre

6. Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Special Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies the Federal Medical Biological Agency (FMBA of Russia)

7. Central State Medical Academy Administration of the President of the Russian Federation

8. Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Radiology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

9. Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National medical research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The article offers the latest view on possibilities of diagnostic algorithm to identify cervical cancer (CC), one of the most incidental tumor of the woman’s reproductive system. The algorithm is described as a consensus of leading expert in imaging diagnostics, as well as oncogynecologysts, investigating diagnostic challenges and cervical cancer therapies. The article sets forth the principal trends in using imaging methods, their role and possibilities for staging CC, planning and assessing the efficacy of applied therapy, on-going surveillance over patients, who have undergone specialized anti-cancer treatment.

Publisher

Vidar, Ltd.

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Reference60 articles.

1. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2009; 105 (2): 103–104. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012

2. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2019; 145 (1): 129–135. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12749

3. Bhatla N., Aoki D., Sharma D.N., Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018; 143 (Suppl. 2): 22–36. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12611

4. Berek J.S., Matsuo K., Grubbs B.H. et al. Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019; 30 (2): e40. http://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e40

5. Bhatla N., Aoki D., Sharma D.N., Sankaranarayanan R. Corrigendum to “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri”. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019; 145: 129–135. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12969