A comparison of semi-automatic and manual analysis of right ventricular strain in speckle tracking echocardiography

Author:

Matveeva M. G.1ORCID,Zarenkova T. A.1ORCID,Skripnikova A. V.1ORCID,Grishin A. M.1ORCID,Alekhin M. N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Central Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation

Abstract

The aim was to compare the reproducibility of the traditional manual analysis of the right ventricle (RV) strain with a semi-automatic analysis (an automatic method with the possibility of adjustment) in speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE).Materials and methods. Evaluation of RV by speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed in 71 patients with two approaches: manual (Q-Analysis) and semi-automatic (AutoStrainRV). Such parameters as RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), RV longitudinal free wall strain (RVLFWS), RV longitudinal free wall segmental strain, and the amplitude of movement of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) were compared.Results. There were no significant differences between the values of RVGLS (21.9 ± 4.7% vs. 21.6 ± 3.6%, p = 0.488, respectively) and RVLFWS (24.6 ± 5.1% vs. 25.3 ± 4.6%, p = 0.212, respectively) obtained by manual and semi-automatic strain analysis. The significant differences were revealed in the values of RVLFWS in the basal and middle segments estimated by a semi-automatic method and by a manual method (22.6 ± 7.1% vs. 27.0 ± 10.1%, p < 0.002, and 23.8 ± 5.9% vs. 25.8 ± 8.0%, p < 0.05, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis showed mean bias for RVGLS -0.31 (95% CI: -7.62–7.00) and for RVLFWS - 0.70 (95% CI: -8.44–9.83). The values of the TAPSE obtained by semi-automatic analysis were lower and significantly different from the values calculated in the M-mode (22.6 ± 3.8 mm vs. 24.9 ± 4.5 mm, p < 0.001). Strain analysis by the semi-automatic method requires less time than the manual method (22.9 ± 4.5 seconds vs. 38.9 ± 7.8 seconds, p < 0.05).Conclusions. The choice of approach for RV strain assessment (manual or semi-automatic) does not significantly affect the values of RV strain but may affect the result of segmental RV strain in the basal and middle segments. The semi-automatic strain analysis of RV provides a faster and more reproducible assessment of RV function. The values of the TAPSE by semi-automatic strain analysis are significantly lower compared to the values of the TAPSE in M-mode.

Publisher

Vidar, Ltd.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3