Kimya ve Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin Alternatif Ölçme ve Değerlendirmeye ilişkin Öz Yeterliliklerinin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Author:

ÖZDEMİR Mehtap1ORCID,NAKİBOĞLU Canan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 75. YIL ORTAOKULU

2. Necatibey Education Faculty

Abstract

When the explanations of the 2018 Secondary Education Chemistry and Science Curricula concerning the assessment and evaluation approach are examined, it is seen that the emphasis is on acting with the understanding of maximum diversity and flexibility in the assessment and evaluation process in both curricula. It is stated that in ensuring the effectiveness of assessment and evaluation practices, the priority is on teachers and educational practitioners. It can be said that the assessment and evaluation approach of both the 2018 Secondary Education Chemistry and Science Curricula are largely based on the alternative assessment and evaluation approach. This study investigates the level of self-efficacy of chemistry and science teachers towards alternative assessment and evaluation tools in terms of different variables. A total of 142 teachers, 97 female and 45 male, participated in the study. 32 of these teachers are chemistry teachers and 110 of them are science teachers. At the end of the study, it was determined that the teachers' self-efficacy levels for alternative assessment and evaluation tools were high. It has been revealed that the variables of gender, branch, and years of service do not have a significant effect on teachers' self-efficacy. In addition, it was concluded that the self-efficacy of teachers with doctoral education is higher than that of teachers with undergraduate and graduate degrees. Suggestions are provided at the end of the study.

Publisher

The Turkish Chemical Society

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Aksoy, A. (2018). İlkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin alternatif ölçme araçları öz yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Examination of primary and secondary school teachers' self-efficacy in alternative assessment tools]. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta.

2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122.

3. Bandura, A. (1995). Comments on the crusade against the causal efficacy of human thought. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 26(3), 179-190.

4. Baş, G., & Beyhan, Ö. (2016). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirmeye yönelik özyeterlik algılarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions on educational measurement and evaluation in terms of some variables]. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7(1), 18-32.

5. Bayat, S., & Şentürk Ş. (2015). Fizik, kimya, biyoloji ortaöğretim alan öğretmenlerinin alternatif ölçme değerlendirme tekniklerine ilişkin görüşleri [Physics, Chemistry, Biology Teachers' Views on Alternative Assessment and Evaluation Techniques in Secondary School]. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 118-135.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3