Making a Difference: Accounting for the Impact of Management Decisions in Environmental Management

Author:

Kabaivanov Stanimir Ivanov1,Markovska Veneta2

Affiliation:

1. University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski, Bulgaria; e-mail: stanimir.kabaivanov@gmail.com

2. University of Food Technologies, Bulgaria; e-mail: venetta@abv.bg

Abstract

Management decisions are typically meant to be making a lasting impact, or at least bringing us one step closer to a long-term goal. Yet there are situations where it is hard to link decisions made and results achieved. The problem gets more complex when comparing different backgrounds, as management quality is often assessed either in specific organizational context (Ghoshal and Bartlett, 1994; Coggburn and Schneider, 2003) or in a finite number of case-studies. These methods have been successfully used for a long time in corporate environment (Gong et al., 2018) and for public sector decisions (Eller et al., 2018), but their application is not as easy when facing problems that are affected by multiple economy-wide factors, and/or by variables that are not directly observable. We study the long term impact on management decisions in environmental management by using market information on different instruments used to manage and control environmental pollution and risk. The core reason for choosing this approach is that market data is able to account for economic reasons and capture changes that go beyond the scope of an individual corporation or a public agency.

Publisher

Editura Universitatii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iasi

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference28 articles.

1. Apostoaie, C. M., 2018. Green Banking: A Shared Responsibility Between Financial Regulators and Banking Institutions. SEA - Practical Application of Science, VI(18), 275-281.

2. Bariviera, A., Guercio, M., and Martinez, L., 2012. A comparative analysis of the informational efficiency of the fixed income market in seven European countries. Economics Letters, 116(3), 426-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.047

3. Climate Bonds Initiative, 2018. Green Bonds Market Summary.

4. Coggburn, J. D., and Schneider, S. K., 2003. The Quality of Management and Government Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the American States. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 206-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00280

5. Dietz, T., 2010. What is a Good Decision? Criteria for Environmental Decision Making. Human Ecology Review, 10(1), 33-39.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3