Development and validation of a novel clinical risk score to predict hypoxemia in children with pneumonia using the WHO PREPARE dataset

Author:

Tan RainerORCID,Chandna Arjun,Colbourn Tim,Hooli Shubhada,King Carina,Lufesi Norman,McCollum Eric D,Mwansambo Charles,Mathew Joseph L.,Cutland Clare,Madhi Shabir Ahmed,Nunes Marta,Basnet Sudha,Strand Tor A.,O’Grady Kerry-Ann,Gessner Brad,Addo-Yobo Emmanuel,Chisaka Noel,Hibberd Patricia L.,Jeena Prakash,Lozano Juan M.,MacLeod William B.,Patel Archana,Thea Donald M.,Nguyen Ngoc Tuong Vy,Lucero Marilla,Zaman Syed Mohammad Akram uz,Bhatnagar Shinjini,Wadhwa Nitya,Lodha Rakesh,Aneja Satinder,Santosham Mathuram,Awasthi Shally,Bavdekar Ashish,Chou Monidarin,Nymadawa Pagbajabyn,Pape Jean-William,Paranhos-Baccala Glaucia,Picot Valentina S.,Rakoto-Andrianarivelo Mala,Rouzier Vanessa,Russomando Graciela,Sylla Mariam,Vanhems Philippe,Wang Jianwei,Libster Romina,Clara Alexey W.,Beynon Fenella,Levine Gillian,Rees Chris A,Neuman Mark I,Qazi Shamim A.,Nisar Yasir BinORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundHypoxemia predicts mortality at all levels of care, and appropriate management can reduce preventable deaths. However, pulse oximetry and oxygen therapy remain inaccessible in many primary care health facilities. We aimed to develop and validate a simple risk score comprising commonly evaluated clinical features to predict hypoxemia in 2-59-month-old children with pneumonia.MethodsData from 7 studies conducted in 5 countries from the Pneumonia Research Partnership to Assess WHO Recommendations (PREPARE) dataset were included. Readily available clinical features and demographic variables were used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model to predict hypoxemia (SpO2<90%) at presentation to care. The adjusted log coefficients were transformed to derive the PREPARE hypoxemia risk score and its diagnostic value was assessed in a held-out, temporal validation dataset.ResultsWe included 14,509 children in the analysis; 9.8% (n=2,515) were hypoxemic at presentation. The multivariable regression model to predict hypoxemia included age, sex, respiratory distress (nasal flaring, grunting and/or head nodding), lower chest indrawing, respiratory rate, body temperature and weight-for-age z-score. The model showed fair discrimination (area under the curve 0.70, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.73) and calibration in the validation dataset. The simplified PREPARE hypoxemia risk score includes 5 variables: age, respiratory distress, lower chest indrawing, respiratory rate and weight-for-age z-score.ConclusionThe PREPARE hypoxemia risk score, comprising five easily available characteristics, can be used to identify hypoxemia in children with pneumonia with a fair degree of certainty for use in health facilities without pulse oximetry. Its implementation would require careful consideration to limit inappropriate referrals on patients and the health system. Further external validation in community settings in low-and middle-income countries is required.KEY MESSAGESWhat is already known on this topicPulse oximetry is unavailable or underutilized in many resource-limited settings in low- and middle-income countries.Hypoxemia is a good predictor of mortality and its early identification and further management can reduce mortality.What this study addsThe PREPARE hypoxemia risk score was developed using one of the largest and most geographically diverse datasets on childhood pneumonia to date.Using age, lower chest indrawing, respiratory rate, respiratory distress and weight-for-age z-score to calculate the PREPARE hypoxemia risk score could help identify children with hypoxemia in settings without pulse oximeters.How this study might affect research, practice or policyThis study contributes to the important discussion on how best to identify hypoxemic children in the absence of pulse oximetry.Further research is warranted to validate the findings in community settingsOperationalizing and integrating the score within existing clinical management pathways must be tailored to the setting of implementation.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3