Test-retest reliability of TMS motor evoked responses and silent periods during explosive voluntary isometric contractions

Author:

Castelli F.ORCID,Mian O.S.ORCID,Bruton A.ORCID,Chembila Valappil A.C.ORCID,Tillin N.A.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study assessed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) test-retest reliability of TMS responses MEPs and silent periods at early, middle, and late phases of the rising time-torque curve during explosive voluntary contractions. We also investigated how the number of consecutively averaged measurements over 3 to 15 separate contractions influenced reliability.MethodsOn two separate occasions 3-7 days apart, 14 adults completed 48 isometric explosives (1-s) contractions of the knee extensors, superimposed with TMS. The TMS elicited an MEP and silent period in the quadriceps muscles at 45 (early), 115 (middle), or 190 ms (late) during each contraction. TMS was also superimposed at the plateau of 15 separate MVCs. Test-retest ICC and CV were calculated for consecutively averaged MEPs and silent periods.ResultsNo one condition was more reliable than another. For MEP amplitude, in all conditions except the explosive late phase, ICCs generally increased, and CV decreased, with an increase in the number of averaged contractions, and were >0.50 ICC and <15% CV within 7 contractions. For silent period, ICCs and CVs were unaffected by the number of consecutively averaged contractions and remained >0.50 ICC and <10% CV.ConclusionTest-retest reliability of TMS responses is comparable between phases of explosive contraction and at the plateau of MVC. To enhance MEP reliability, with the increases he number of averaged contractions of except the explosive late phase, we recommend studies average data across > the 3-5 contractions typically reported in the literature for studies using TMS during MVCs.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3