Social isolation in mid-life: associations with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated health in two successive British birth cohorts

Author:

Mansfield Rosie,Richards Marcus,Ploubidis George B.,Henderson Morag,Patalay Praveetha

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesSocial isolation can be quantified using indicators across a range of social contexts e.g., household composition, friends and family, employment and community. Little is known about the way in which different forms of isolation differentially impact health, whether they produce a ‘dose-response’ effect, and whether different forms of isolation interact in an additive or multiplicative way to impact psychological distress, life satisfaction and general health. The current study focuses on social isolation in mid-life – a life stage often neglected by the field.Research Design and MethodData (N=32,391) were analysed from two successive British birth cohort studies: 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS) N=16,585 and the 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS) N=15,806 focusing on participants’ social isolation during mid-life (ages 42-46). Linear multivariable regression models were run to investigate the independent, ‘dose-response’ and interactive associations of social isolation indicators with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated general health. Subsequently, all models were stratified to examine sex differences, and a cohort interaction was tested to assess cohort effects. An additional latent class analysis investigated whether different forms of isolation cluster in mid-life.ResultsIndependent associations varied by form of isolation and specific health outcomes, for instance, being out of education and employment was associated with all outcomes, living alone was only associated with lower life satisfaction and a lack of frequent contact with friends and relatives, no labour market participation and limited community engagement were associated with lower life satisfaction and self-rated general health. There was a ‘dose-response’ relationship with higher social isolation scores associated with greater psychological distress, lower life satisfaction, and poorer self-reported general health. The effects of different combinations of social isolation on health appears to be additive, with no consistent sex and cohort differences observed.ConclusionsResults support a multi-domain, multi-context approach to studying social isolation and provides justification for research that investigates the separate and combined effects of different forms of social isolation; and the relevance of investigating social isolation in relation to the complete state of physical, mental and social wellbeing. Overall, isolation in its various forms was found to be detrimental for health, in mid-life, and over time in Great Britain. In particular, social isolation was associated most consistently with lower levels of life satisfaction. Efforts to reduce social isolation and its negative health impacts must recognise the complexity of experience across contexts and for different populations.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3