A Methodological Review of Patient Healthcare-Seeking Journeys from Symptom Onset to Receipt of Care

Author:

Oga-Omenka CharityORCID,Sassi Angelina,Vasquez Nathaly AguileraORCID,Rana NamrataORCID,Essar Mohammad Yasir,Ku DarrylORCID,Diploma HannaORCID,Huria LavanyaORCID,Saqib Kiran,Das RishavORCID,Stallworthy GuyORCID,Pai Madhukar

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFor many diseases, early diagnosis and treatment are more cost-effective, reduce community spread of infectious diseases, and result in better patient outcomes. However, healthcare-seeking and diagnoses for several diseases are unnecessarily delayed. For example, in 2022, 3 million and 5.6 million people living with TB and HIV respectively were undiagnosed. Many patients never access appropriate testing, remain undiagnosed after testing or drop out shortly after treatment initiation. This underscores challenges in accessing healthcare for many individuals. Understanding healthcare-seeking obstacles can expose bottlenecks in healthcare delivery and promote equity of access. We aimed to synthesize methodologies used to portray healthcare-seeking trajectories and provide a conceptual framework for patient journey analyses.Design/MethodsWe conducted a literature search using keywords related to “patient/care healthcare-seeking/journey/pathway analysis” AND “TB” OR “infectious/pulmonary diseases” in PubMED, CINAHL, Web of Science and Global Health (OVID). From a preliminary scoping search and expert consultation, we developed a conceptual framework and honed the key data points necessary to understand patients’ healthcare-seeking journeys, which then served as our inclusion criteria for the subsequent expanded review. Retained papers included at least three of these data points.ResultsOur conceptual framework included 5 data points and 7 related indicators that contribute to understanding patients’ experiences during healthcare-seeking. We retained 66 studies that met our eligibility criteria. Most studies (56.3%) were in Central and Southeast Asia, explored TB healthcare-seeking experiences (76.6%), were quantitative (67.2%), used in-depth, semi-structured, or structured questionnaires for data collection (73.4%). Healthcare-seeking journeys were explored, measured and portrayed in different ways, with no consistency in included information.ConclusionsWe synthesized various methodologies in exploring patient healthcare-seeking journeys and found crucial data points necessary to understand challenges patients encounter when interacting with health systems. and offer insights to researchers and healthcare practitioners. Our framework proposes a standardized approach to patient journey research.Key QuestionsWhat is already known about this subject?Accessing healthcare is challenging for half of the world’s population.Understanding healthcare-seeking obstacles can help to expose bottlenecks in healthcare delivery and improve access.What does this study add?We synthesized the different methodologies used by researchers to portray healthcare- seeking trajectories.We also provide a conceptual framework and recommendations for patient journey analyses.How do the new findings imply?Our analysis revealed a lack of consistency in how patient journeys to care are represented and a notable complexity in generating insightful depictions of journeys to care.The use of our conceptual framework, namely the data points and indicators, could increase the reliability and generalisability patient journey analyses.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference121 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Tracking universal health coverage: 2023 global monitoring report: World Health Organization; 2023.

2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2023. 2023.

3. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. The path that ends AIDS: 2023 UNAIDS global AIDS update. 2023.

4. Faust L , Naidoo P , Caceres-Cardenas G , et al. Improving measurement of tuberculosis care cascades to enhance people-centred care. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2023.

5. Pre-treatment loss to follow-up in tuberculosis patients in low-and lower-middle-income countries and high- burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3