Abstract
AbstractToxoplasma gondii(T. gondii) is a trophically-transmitted protozoan parasite that has been suggested to facilitate its transmission by altering intermediate hosts’ anti-predator behaviour, thus increasing the likelihood of completing the cycle inside its definitive host i.e. domestic and wild felines.T. gondiihas been linked to reduced risk-aversion, slower reaction times, and more exploratory behaviours in intermediate hosts, including most famously weakened aversion to the scent of feline predators in mice. Studies examining this phenomenon, however, have almost exclusively been carried out in laboratory conditions with small mammals, whereas little is known about the role ofT. gondiiwithin more complex ecological contexts involving large mammals in the wild. Under such scenario, the goals of our study were three-fold. Firstly, to determine the prevalence ofT. gondiiinfection in a population of free-living fallow deer (Dama dama) living in a park at the edge of a metropolis. Secondly, to find a link between deer seropositivity and space use in the park, namely proximity to buildings with domestic cats, where deer may have been more likely to contract the disease. Finally, to determine whether infection withT. gondiiwas linked to risk taking behaviour in these free ranging large mammals, namely likelihood to approach park visitors. To achieve our goals, we estimated seropositivity and combined it with spatial distribution and behavioural data of individually-recognizable deer ranging from those that avoid humans (risk-avoiders) to those who beg for food (risk-takers). We foundT. gondiito be quite widespread in this population with a seropositive of 20% (24 out of 120 individuals). Contrary to our expectations, we found no correlation betweenT. gondiiseropositivity and space use in the park, therefore not allowing us to engage with the dynamics of disease contraction. We did however find that fallow deer taking the risk of approaching humans were also more likely to be seropositive. Are risk taking individuals more likely to contract the disease? Or, alternatively, do they take more risk because they have contracted the disease? The causal mechanism behind our result has yet to be disentangled, opening new scenarios in research aimed at tackling host manipulation in this parasite. It is a fact, however, that those animals that were more likely to be in contact with the public were also those more likely to be seropositive, adding key empirical evidence to the study of zoonotic diseases. Our study is a significant contribution on the transmission and maintenance dynamics ofT. gondii, offering new insights on the need to conduct longitudinal studies able to disentangle the causal mechanism andT. gondii’s ability to manipulate its intermediate host.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory