Landscape of Differentiation Potentials as a “Hallmark” in Oral-derived MSCs

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer clinical promise for use in cell therapy approaches for regenerative medicine. A therapeutic challenge is that MSCs from different tissues are phenotypically and functionally distinct. Therefore, this study aims to molecularly characterize oral-derived MSCs by defining one of the three hallmarks of MSCs, differentiation potential, to discern their true molecular identities.MethodsThree different populations of oral tissue MSCs (from alveolar bone-aBMSCs; from dental pulp-DPSCs; and from gingiva-GMSCs) from three different patients were isolated and cultured. These MSCs were characterized for their stemness by flow cytometry and multi-differentiation potential, and their RNA was also isolated and analyzed quantitatively with RNA sequencing. Total mRNA-seq was performed and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in pairwise (DPSCs vs. aBMSCs, GMSCs vs. aBMSCs, and GMSCs vs. DPSCs) and tissue-specific comparisons (aBMSCs vs. Others, DPSCs vs. Others, GMSCs vs. Others) (FDR,p<0.05). Further, these DEGs, either common between MSC populations or unique to a specific MSC population, were evaluated for pathways and biological processesResultsaBMSCs, DPSCs, and GMSCs were successfully isolated and characterized. The tissue-specific comparison revealed that DEGs were most numerous in DPSCs (693 genes) as compared to aBMSCs (103 genes) or DPSCs (232 genes). Statistically significant DEGs through pairwise comparisons present higher numbers in GMSCs vs. DPSCs (627) as compared to either DPSCs vs aBMSCs (286) or GMSCs vs. aBMSCs (82). Further analysis found that RUNX2, IBSP, SOX6, ACAN, and VCAM1 were significantly upregulated in aBMSCs. In DPSCs, BMP4 and IL6 were significantly downregulated, whereas AXL and NES were significantly upregulated. In GMSCs, AGPT1, SEMA4D, and PGDFA were significantly downregulated. Additionally, MAPK, PI3-AKT, and RAS signaling pathways were significantly regulated in GMSCs. Interestingly, aBMSCs and DPSCs revealed positive regulation of osteoblast differentiation, whereas GMSCs revealed negative regulation of osteoblast differentiation. DPSCs also revealed negative regulation of angiogenesis.ConclusionsOral-derived MSCs have an inherent “landscape” of differentiation defined by their tissue of origin; yet this differentiation potential can be modulated by their microenvironment.Graphical Abstract