Taking on colonial institutions: making room for an Indigenous Research Paradigm in prospective biomedical research in tertiary hospitals

Author:

O’Brien Jessica,Gutman Sarah J,Wade Vicki,Walker Toni,Taylor Andrew J,Adams Karen

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundA paradigmatic clash exists between biomedical and Indigenous research frameworks. Problematically, when ill-fit biomedical research frameworks are applied Indigenous peoples can experience exclusion from biomedical studies and consequent potential health benefits. To overcome these issues, community based participatory research methodologies are often recommended. However, these can prove difficult to apply in tertiary healthcare research where prospective Indigenous peoples and families participating in research will come from unforeseen and numerous Indigenous communities. Adding further complexity, there appears a dearth of information for achieving incorporation of decolonising and Indigenous research frameworks into this type of prospective research.MethodsWe sought to reflect on and describe inclusion of an Indigenous Research Paradigm into the establishment of a prospective multi-site tertiary healthcare study on improving diagnosis and treatment of acute rheumatic fever. To generate reflection, the First Nations’ Yarning method was employed allowing qualitative findings to be generated via Indigenous epistemology and ontology.FindingsFour main areas were identified as requiring significant change to align with an Indigenous Research Paradigm: stakeholder engagement, project design, consent processes, and multi-site approach. Multi-layered Indigenous leadership was recognised as a crucial component of the transformation and of the project’s success more broadly.InterpretationWith extensive local First Nations involvement and a First Nations-led research team, a multi-site institution-based biomedical research project can be successfully adapted to be more in keeping with an Indigenous Research Paradigm.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference30 articles.

1. Smith LT . Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Zed Books; 2012.

2. Etuaptmumk (Two-Eyed Seeing) and Ethical Space: Ways to Disrupt Health Researchers’ Colonial Attraction to a Singular Biomedical Worldview;Witness: The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse,2021

3. There’s ‘consent’ and then there’s consent: Mobilising Māori and Indigenous research ethics to problematise the western biomedical model;Journal of Sociology,2020

4. WHO (World Health Organization). Indigenous peoples & participatory health research. Geneva: WHO (World Health Organization); 2003.

5. Denzin NK , Lincoln YS , Smith LT . Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. London: SAGE; 2008.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3