Abstract
AbstractSpecies are often regarded as basic units of study in biology, following the presumption that they are real and discrete natural entities. But several biologists wonder if species are arbitrary divisions that do not correspond to discrete natural groups of organisms. Two issues must be addressed to solve this controversy, but few studies seem to do so. The first is whether organisms form sympatric and synchronic groups that are distinct in terms of phenotypes and genome-wide allele frequencies, often called “good species.” Alternatives to “good species” include “cryptic species,” syngameons and, more generally, cases in which phenotypes and genome-wide allele frequencies reflect contrasting evolutionary histories. The second issue is the degree to which species taxa (i.e., taxonomic classification at the species level) reflect natural groups of organisms or constitute arbitrary divisions of biological diversity. Here, we empirically addressed both issues by studying plants of the Andean genus Espeletia (Asteraceae). We collected a geographically dense sample of 538 specimens from the paramo de Sumapaz, in the Cordillera Oriental of Colombia. Additionally, we examined 165 herbarium specimens previously collected by other researchers in this region, or from taxa known to occur there. We tested for the existence of phenotypic groups using normal mixture models and data on 13 quantitative characters. Among 307 specimens with all 13 measurements, we found six distinct phenotypic groups in sympatry. We also tested for the existence of groups defined by genome-wide allele frequencies, using ancestry models and data on 2,098 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Among 77 specimens with complete genomic data, we found three groups in sympatry, with high levels of admixture. Concordance between groups defined by phenotype and genome-wide allele frequencies was low, suggesting that phenotypes and genome-wide allele frequencies reflect contrasting evolutionary histories. Moreover, the high levels of admixture suggest that Espeletia plants form a syngameon in the paramo de Sumapaz. To determine the extent to which species taxa corresponded to phenotypic and genomic groups, we used data on 12 phenotypic characters to assign 307 specimens to species taxa, according to descriptions of species taxa in the most recent monograph of Espeletia. This sample included 27 specimens cited in the monograph. Remarkably, only one out of 307 specimens in our sample fell inside any of the phenotypic ranges reported in the monograph for the species taxa known to occur in the paramo de Sumapaz. These results show that species taxa in Espeletia are delineations of largely empty phenotypic space that miss biological diversity.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference93 articles.
1. A niche for neutrality
2. Agresti A. 2002. Categorical data analysis. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
3. Allmon W.D. 2016. Studying species in the fossil record?: a review and recommendations for a more unified approach. In: Allmon W.D. , Yacobucci M.M. , editors. Species and speciation in the fossil record. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press. p. 59–120.
4. Arnold M.L. 2015. Divergence with genetic exchange. OUP Oxford. 272 p.
5. Species as units of diversity: an outdated concept;Theory Biosci,1998