Abstract
Here, we provide detailed background information for our work on Bayesian inference of change-points in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (Dehning et al., Science, 2020). We outline the general background of Bayesian inference and of SIR-like models. We explain the assumptions that underlie model-based estimates of the reproduction number and compare them to the assumptions that underlie model-free estimates, such as used in the Robert-Koch Institute situation reports. We highlight effects that originate from the two estimation approaches, and how they may cause differences in the inferred reproduction number. Furthermore, we explore the challenges that originate from data availability — such as publication delays and inconsistent testing — and explain their impact on the time-course of inferred case numbers. Along with alternative data sources, this allowed us to cross-check and verify our previous results.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Reference26 articles.
1. J. Dehning , J. Zierenberg , F. P. Spitzner , M. Wibral , J. Pinheiro Neto , M. Wilczek , and V. Priesemann. Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions. Science, 369(6500), July 2020.
2. T. E. Harris. The Theory of Branching Processes. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1963.
3. Erläuterung der Schätzung der zeitlich variierenden Reproduktionszahl R/7-Tages-R, https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Projekte_RKI/R-Wert-Erlaeuterung.html.
4. E. T Jaynes . Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge university press, 2003.
5. J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York, 2nd edition, Sep 2009.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献