Statistically Consistent Rooting of Species Trees under the Multispecies Coalescent Model

Author:

Tabatabaee YasaminORCID,Roch SebastienORCID,Warnow TandyORCID

Abstract

AbstractRooted species trees are used in several downstream applications of phylogenetics. Most species tree estimation methods produce unrooted trees and additional methods are then used to root these unrooted trees. Recently, Quintet Rooting (QR) (Tabatabaee et al., ISMB and Bioinformatics 2022), a polynomial-time method for rooting an unrooted species tree given unrooted gene trees under the multispecies coalescent, was introduced. QR, which is based on a proof of identifiability of rooted 5-taxon trees in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting, was shown to have good accuracy, improving over other methods for rooting species trees when incomplete lineage sorting was the only cause of gene tree discordance, except when gene tree estimation error was very high. However, the statistical consistency of QR was left as an open question. Here, we present QR-STAR, a polynomial-time variant of QR that has an additional step for determining the rooted shape of each quintet tree. We prove that QR-STAR is statistically consistent under the multispecies coalescent model. Our simulation study under a variety of model conditions shows that QR-STAR matches or improves on the accuracy of QR. QR-STAR is available in open source form athttps://github.com/ytabatabaee/Quintet-Rooting.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference35 articles.

1. Inferring rooted species trees from unrooted gene trees using approximate Bayesian computation;Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2017

2. Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent

3. The large-sample asymptotic behaviour of quartet-based summary methods for species tree inference;Journal of Mathematical Biology,2022

4. STRIDE: species tree root inference from gene duplication events;Molecular Biology and Evolution,2017

5. Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3