Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews. Protocol for a systematic methodological review

Author:

Gutierrez-Arias RuvistayORCID,Pieper DawidORCID,Lunny CaroleORCID,Torres-Castro RodrigoORCID,Aguilera-Eguía RaúlORCID,Seron PamelaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionOne of the most conflicting methodological issues when conducting an overview is the overlap of primary studies included across systematic reviews (SRs). Overlap in the pooled effect estimates across SRs may lead to overly precise effect estimates in the overview. SRs that focus on exercise-related interventions are often included in overviews aimed at grouping and determining the effectiveness of various interventions for the management of specific health conditions.ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic methodological review is to describe the strategies used by authors of overviews focusing on exercise-related interventions to manage the overlap of primary studies.Materials and methodsA comprehensive search strategy has been developed for different databases and their platforms. The databases to be consulted will be MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library), and Epistemonikos. Two reviewers will independently screen the records identified through the search strategy and will extract the information from the included overviews. The frequency and the type of overlap management strategies of the primary studies included in the SRs will be considered as the main outcome. In addition, the recognition of the lack of use of any overlap management strategy and the congruence between planning and conducting the overview focusing on overlap management strategies will be assessed. A sub-group analysis will be carried out using the impact factor of the journals at the time of publication of the overviews as the variable.DiscussionThis methodological review will provide a complete and comprehensive summary of the frequency of use and types of strategies used for managing the overlap of primary studies across the SRs included in the overviews focusing on exercise-related interventions in different health conditions. Future studies should apply different overlap management strategies to understand their impact on results and conclusions.Systematic review registrationINPLASY202250161.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference33 articles.

1. Bibliometric analysis of the literature of randomized controlled trials;J Med Libr Assoc,2005

2. Evidence-based practice: attitudes, knowledge and behaviour among allied health care professionals

3. Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews

4. Chandler J , Cumpston M , Thomas J , Higgins J , Deeks J , Clarke M. Chapter I: Introduction. In: Higgins JPT , Thomas J , Chandler J , Cumpston M , Li T , Page MJ , Welch VA (editors). In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 62 (updated February 2021). Ccochrane; 2021.

5. How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO;BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3