The natural history of homonymous hemianopia revisited

Author:

Saionz Elizabeth L.ORCID,Cavanaugh Matthew R.,Johnson Brent A.,Harrington Donald,Aguirre Geoffrey K.,Huxlin Krystel R.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo re-evaluate the longitudinal progression of stroke-induced homonymous visual field defects using strictly automated perimetry (Zeiss Humphrey Systems), rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria, and quantitative analyses.MethodsA retrospective chart review of stroke patients diagnosed with “homonymous hemianopia”, who underwent monocular Humphrey visual field (HVF) perimetry using the 24-2 SITA standard pattern from 2011-2019, was conducted at a large US academic medical center. Reliable tests (<20% fixation losses, false positives, and false negatives) were identified and analyzed with generalized estimating equations to extract temporal trends in perimetric mean deviation (PMD) and deficit area.ResultsOf 532 patients with “homonymous hemianopia”, sequential, reliable HVFs were only available for 36 patients in the right eye, and 30 patients in the left eye, ranging from 7 days to 58 months post-stroke. Both PMD and deficit area improved early, within the first 3 months post-stroke; however, this was followed by a subsequent decline in performance >1 year post-stroke. Changes were similar between eyes.ConclusionWe discovered that a large portion of occipital stroke patients do not receive comprehensive ophthalmologic follow-up and, even then, only a fraction of HVFs performed are reliable enough for rigorous analysis. Nonetheless, reliable HVFs in such patients confirmed early visual improvement after stroke, consistent with prior reports. However, in contrast with prior, qualitative reports, there was no stability of the deficit beyond 6 months post-stroke; instead, gradual worsening erased the initial spontaneous improvement, especially >1 year post-stroke.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference36 articles.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3