Towards estimating true cholera burden: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Vibrio cholerae positivity

Author:

Wiens Kirsten E.ORCID,Xu HanmengORCID,Zou Kaiyue,Mwaba John,Lessler JustinORCID,Malembaka Espoir B.ORCID,Demby Maya N.,Bwire GodfreyORCID,Qadri FirdausiORCID,Lee Elizabeth C.ORCID,Azman Andrew S.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCholera surveillance relies on clinical diagnosis of acute watery diarrhea. Suspected cholera case definitions have high sensitivity but low specificity, challenging our ability to characterize cholera burden and epidemiology. Our objective was to estimate the proportion of clinically suspected cholera that are true Vibrio cholerae infections and identify factors that explain variation in positivity.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies from 2000-2021 that tested ≥10 suspected cholera cases for V. cholerae O1/O139 using culture, PCR and/or a rapid diagnostic test. We estimated diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity using a latent class meta-analysis. We estimated positivity using a random-effects meta-analysis, adjusting for test performance and study methodology.ResultsWe included 113 studies from 28 countries. V. cholerae positivity was lower in studies with representative sampling and lower minimum ages in suspected case definitions. After adjusting for sampling methods, case definitions, and tests, on average half (49%, 95% Credible Interval: 43%-54%) of suspected cases represented true V. cholerae infections, although variation across studies was high. Odds of a suspected case having a true infection were 1.64 (95% Credible Interval: 1.06-2.52) times higher when surveillance was initiated in response to an outbreak than in non-outbreak settings.ConclusionsBurden estimates based on suspected cases alone may overestimate the incidence of medically attended cholera about twofold. However, accounting for cases missed by traditional clinical surveillance is key to unbiased overall cholera burden estimates. Given variability between settings, assumptions about positivity, which are necessary without exhaustive testing, should be based on local data.Key pointsBy pooling results from 113 studies and adjusting for diagnostic tests and study methods, we find that approximately half of suspected cholera cases represent true Vibrio cholerae infections, though this fraction varies widely across epidemiological settings.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3