Home working and its association with social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from seven UK longitudinal population surveys

Author:

Wels JacquesORCID,Wielgoszewska Bożena,Moltrecht Bettina,Booth Charlotte,Green Michael J,Hamilton Olivia KL,Demou EvangeliaORCID,Gessa Giorgio Di,Huggins Charlotte,Zhu Jingmin,Santorelli Gillian,Silverwood Richard J.,Kopasker Daniel,Shaw Richard J.ORCID,Hughes AlunORCID,Patalay Praveetha,Steves Claire,Chaturvedi Nish,Porteous DavidORCID,Rhead Rebecca,Katikireddi Srinivasa VittalORCID,Ploubidis George B.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHome working rates have increased since the COVID-19 pandemic’s onset, but the health implications of this transformation are unclear. We assessed the association between home working and social and mental wellbeing through harmonised analyses of seven UK longitudinal studies.MethodsWe estimated associations between home working and measures of psychological distress, low life satisfaction, poor self-rated health, low social contact, and loneliness across three different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic (T1= Apr-Jun 2020 – first lockdown, T2=Jul-Oct 2020 – eased restrictions, T3=Nov 2020-Mar 2021 – second lockdown), in seven population-based cohort studies using modified Poisson regression and meta-analyses to pool results across studies.FindingsAmong 34,131 observations spread over three time points, we found higher rates of home working at T1 and T3 compared with T2, reflecting lockdown periods. Home working was not associated with psychological distress at T1 (RR=0.92, 95%CI=0.79-1.08) or T2 (RR=0.99, 95%CI=0.88-1.11), but a detrimental association was found with psychological distress at T3 (RR=1.17, 95%CI=1.05-1.30). Poorer psychological distress associated with home working was observed for those educated to below degree level at T2 and T3. Men working from home reported poorer self-reported health at T2.InterpretationNo clear evidence of an association between home working and mental wellbeing was found, apart from greater risk of psychological distress associated with home working during the second lockdown, but differences across sub-groups may exist. Longer term shifts to home working might not have adverse impacts on population wellbeing in the absence of pandemic restrictions but further monitoring of health inequalities is required.FundingNational Core Studies, funded by UKRI, NIHR and the Health and Safety Executive.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference36 articles.

1. Towards a ‘virtual’ world: Social isolation and struggles during the COVID-19 pandemic as single women living alone;Gend Work Organ,2020

2. ILO. From potential to practice: Preliminary findings on the numbers of workers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. ILO Policy Brief 2021; March 2021.

3. Office for National Statistics. Business and individual attitudes towards the future of homeworking, UK April to May 2021. 2021.

4. Chung H , Seo H , Forbes S , Birkett H. Working from home during the COVID-19 lockdown: Changing preferences and the future of work. University of Kent 2020; : 1–39.

5. Induction of SARS-CoV-2-Specific IgG and IgA in Serum and Milk with Different SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Breastfeeding Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Northern Spain

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3